Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
   |
Posted - 2008.11.01 18:25:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 01/11/2008 18:30:47
And the results were.... unsurprisingly a big feck off from CCP who cant "see any compelling reason to listen to the CSM" LOLOLOLOLOLOL
______________________
2. 0101-01-0030 Wreck Flagging in PVP
Jade Constantine explained that in high-sec wars, it often happens that 3rd parties steal loot from a conflict site. These players then only get flagged to the owner of the wreck, but not the person that killed the ship. Since the owner is not in a position to do anything about the theft. He proposed to set wrecks to dual ownership, so that both the killer and victim have rights to it, and anyone stealing gets flagged to both parties.
CCP Greyscale answered he believes that dual ownership is not easily implemented technically and that this game mechanic was discussed internally and found working as intended. CCP is also not convinced that changes to these mechanics will benefit gameplay.
Jade Constantine replied that he believed that dual ownership would lead to more opportunity for pvp as well as consequence to action in high-security space, and that he believed it is a bad idea that that loot theft is currently without consequence.
CCP Greyscale said that there is already consequence because the victim is allowed to shoot the thief.
CCP Hammer added that he feels CCP would be opening a can of worms if the system was changed to dual-ownership.
Dierdra Vaal and Tusko Hopkins noted that the owner of the wreck is usually in no position to deal out justice, and thus this constitutes no risk for the thief.
Omber Zombie suggested that instead of dual ownership, either the wreck could be flagged to the ownerĘs gang, who can then shoot thieves, or that it can be flagged to the killer for a limited time after which it reverts to the owner.
CCP Greyscale closed by saying that this issue needs further discussion within CCP and the CSM but that he currently did not see any compelling reasons that warrants immediate change.
_______________
A rare commendation from me for the CSM member who actualy shot down all of CCPs points in flames. Greyscale should have been pushed much harder after his "risk" point was crushed.
And for CCP, yes a standard whitewash, and another of the most popular player threads is discussed and duely ignored by the know it all divs.
Further evidence that CCP only tick the box of stuff they were doing anyway.
In one ear - Out the other.
SKUNK
 Originally by: CCP Navigator
People who think I am joking or talking big are going to understand very quickly that there will be order
|